Buck Institute for Education

Your Email:

Your Name:

To:

Subject:

Message:
This paper focuses on how teachers changed their teaching philosophy and technology skills following summer in-service workshops. More importantly, it examines whether these changes sustained themselves in the face of school year and classroom realities. We found that the timing of data collection is an important factor to consider when interpreting program outcomes. Teachers' beliefs about teaching and their sense of competency with technologies varied at three different times: prior to summer workshops, after the summer workshops, and after 10 months of subsequent teaching. It is important to distinguish changes that are temporary and due to enthusiasm immediately after a workshop from changes that sustain themselves or emerge over time as the initial impact of the workshop fades and the reality of the classroom comes to the fore. Guided by Katzer's (1981) "error model" of research, we examine the importance of time of data collection and other sources of error to improve our knowledge of program impacts. Read more at the Buck Institute for Education website: http://www.bie.org/balancing_teachers_willingness_to_change_with_classroom_realities/